Today, GDLS leaders see the program's cultural effect and confirmed cost savings.
End-user requests for equipment were measured by tracking the percentage of requests kept as specified, and the time required to fulfill each request. Through October 2005, 99 percent of all equipment requests were fulfilled as specified and on time. Action was promptly taken to address any negative feedback or suggested improvements. End-users consistently gave high marks to the program's performance, importance and usefulness. GDLS surveys formally measured customer satisfaction.
This gradually created a buzz from one group of satisfied customers that could be leveraged before and during the program's introduction into the next campus. LaPrise says that the strategy of implementing the program "one campus at a time" was also important. They remember past programs that didn't work and disappeared." "Engineers don't respond well to programs that are forced on them. "Regardless of whether management supports an initiative, the end-user of the equipment must be on board or it's doomed to fail," LaPrise says. GDLS hosted forums to ensure that engineers and technicians, the program's primary customers, understood the costs and benefits, how it worked and what results to expect. "Test Resource Management helped us integrate utilization of test equipment among our labs," says Norm LaPrise, engineering design and development laboratories manager at GDLS. The combination creates high-cost, high-risk exposure for product development cycles." "Furthermore, we find, at times, upward of 50 percent of test equipment no longer meets ever-changing industry standards. "It sounds hard to believe, but we find test equipment sits idle 85-90 percent of the time in the defense industry," continues McNamara. Most of it is likely sitting idle, and half of that idling into obsolescence. If you have 5,000 pieces at $6,000 each, for example, you're looking at $30 million invested in equipment. "You get a clear picture of the financial case for change in the test environment. "Do the math," says Paul McNamara, CEO of The Sente Group Inc., which developed TRM. Low utilization rates are particularly alarming when considering the high purchase price of the test equipment frequently found at any given location of a large defense contractor. The program also helped GDLS break down interdepartmental barriers, resulting in more efficient access to more effective test equipment and significant reductions in wasted lab space. Capital-spending reductions surpassed 100 percent of the goal, and operating-expense savings and cash-flow goals were bested by more than 300 percent. Rigorous performance metrics for GDLS were exceeded on a number of fronts. Even fewer have the practices, tools and people it takes to implement plans that produce measurable, sustainable results, which is why GDLS embarked on a program known as test resource management (TRM). Marine Corps and allied nations.įew defense contractors see the effect that their testing function has on profitability, time-to-market and engineering productivity. Headquartered in Sterling Heights, Michigan, GDLS employs more than 7,400 people who design, manufacture, and support land and amphibious combat systems for the U.S. Engineering personnel spend significant amounts of time and money in test design, test execution and test-equipment procurement. They are well versed with the grammar and have a habit of doing this job on a daily basis which makes it easy for them to spot errors.For high-tech electronics companies, such as General Dynamics Land Systems, testing is indispensable to success. They are able to correct the copy instantly and with ease.
On the other hand, when a copy is given to an expert, who is trained for this, he/she knows what to look for and how to look for it. For a layman, it may get a tough job to go through copy again and again looking after for such mistakes. When we say grammar, it has many elements included like tenses, punctuation, spellings, and others. It is always suggested that one should check their copies for any sort of grammatical errors before making them available to the audience. At some point of time, a reader may lose interest from the piece and this writer's work will go waste. As a reader will read through the piece, he/she will pay attention to these errors and will have to struggle to understand what the writer wants to say. These grammatical errors can prove to be bad for a piece of work. The first step is knowing English Grammar errors